Nominalism claims only particular things exist, universals are just names
Nominalism
Nominalism claims only particular things exist, universals are just names
There are two main versions of nominalism: one denies the existence of universals, while the other denies the existence of abstract objects. Some nominalists believe that only physical particulars are real, whereas others acknowledge that some particulars can be abstract entities (like numbers) or concrete entities (like pillars, snakes, and bananas). This distinction highlights the varying interpretations within nominalism regarding the nature of reality.
Example
A nominalist would argue that the concept of "humanity" is just a label we use to describe a set of characteristics shared by many individuals, rather than an independent, existing entity.
Understanding nominalism is crucial for grasping different philosophical perspectives on the nature of universals and abstract objects.
Related concepts
Problem of universals
Universals question independent existence
Eliminative materialism
Eliminative materialism claims many mental states don't exist
the Upanishadic concept of Brahman-Atman identity claims
Brahman-Atman identity posits the individual self (Atman) is identical to ultimate reality (Brahman)
Moral nihilism
Moral nihilism asserts that nothing is morally right or wrong
Instrumentalism
Instrumentalism views scientific theories as useful tools, not as descriptions of unobservable reality
the Buddhist concept of anatta (no-self) claims
Anatta: No permanent, unchanging self exists
One email a day: 5 concepts + the 5 stories that matter →
Swipe through 100 ML concepts daily
Open TickerNews