Universals question: Do abstract properties like redness exist independently of particular objects?
Universals question: Do abstract properties like redness exist independently of particular objects?
What nominalism claims — only particular things exist, universals are just names
Nominalism posits that only individual objects exist, universals are mere linguistic constructs
What substance dualism claims — mind and body are fundamentally different kinds of stuff
Dualism posits that mind and body are distinct, non-physical and physical substances, respectively
What Plato's theory of Forms claims — abstract perfect Forms are more real than physical copies
Plato's theory of Forms posits that abstract, perfect Forms represent the truest reality, surpassing physical copies
What Kant's categorical imperative says — act only by rules you could universalize
Act according to maxims that could be willed as universal laws
What qualia are — the subjective, felt qualities of experience (the redness of red)
Qualia represent the intrinsic, subjective aspects of conscious experiences
What the underdetermination of theory by data means — evidence is always compatible with multiple theories
Underdetermination implies that evidence does not uniquely determine a single theory
One email a day: 5 concepts + the 5 stories that matter →
Swipe through 100 ML concepts daily
Open TickerNews